跳到正文
10月17日周六
  1. IT之家·人工智能46

    谷歌 DeepMind 哈萨比斯预警:AI 智能体网络攻击是前哨警报,未来一两年恐现灾难性事件

    谷歌 DeepMind 联合创始人兼董事长哈萨比斯称,近期 AI 智能体发起的网络攻击是"前哨预警",若全行业与各国政府不加大系统安全投入,未来一至两年很可能演变为灾难性重大事件。微软总裁史密斯在同一峰会上称 AI 失控行为让 2026 年成为"令人警醒的一年",呼吁出台合理平衡的 AI 安全法律与监管。哈萨比斯主张建立张弛有度、反应敏捷的国际标准机构,并动态构建与风险匹配的认证机制。

  2. IT之家·人工智能45

    黄仁勋回应 AI 概念股大跌:一切都会过去,AI 影响才刚开始

    英伟达 CEO 黄仁勋回应近期 AI 概念股大跌,称“一切都会过去”,AI 将对各行各业和每个国家产生非常积极的影响,且进程才刚开始。此前费城半导体指数连续 8 个交易日下跌,创 2008 年以来最长连跌纪录,英伟达过去 8 个交易日有 7 日收跌。黄仁勋强调短期消息不会改变基本面,投资者应关注第一性原理。

  3. Alexander Embiricos63

    Alexander Embiricos 转发并推荐 Dan Shipper 的 Codex 起源长文,称对话有趣且自己的引述比平时更直白。引用文称 Codex 一年前未找到 PMF,12 个月内 Codex 与 ChatGPT for Work 周用户超 40M,团队一年做了四款产品形态并用 Codex 开发 Codex;文章采用 agent 原生设计,附完整访谈转录,可在 ChatGPT 应用内浏览器中与智能体一同阅读。

    引用Dan Shipper@danshipper

    Codex is one of the most important untold stories in the history of technology. A year ago, it was a scrappy effort in a quiet corner of @OpenAI. Its cloud product hadn’t found PMF, and the team was starting over from scratch. Less than 12 months later: - Codex swallowed the flagship ChatGPT desktop app from the inside (it literally runs as com.openai.codex on your Mac) - Codex and ChatGPT for Work hit 40M+ weekly users across engineering and knowledge work - Its leader @thsottiaux was elevated to run all of OpenAI’s core products, including ChatGPT, Codex, and the API How did they pull it off? They trained their own dedicated model line, separate from ChatGPT, with researchers and product builders sitting on the same team They built four different products in a single year (cloud → terminal → IDE sidebar → a desktop app with no code editor at all) as every model leap made a new form factor possible They used Codex to build Codex—so a handful of people could prove a new product in weeks instead of arguing for it in meetings I had a front-row seat to the whole arc—from their failed Cloud launch, to OpenAI’s offices the night before GPT-5 dropped, to the day Codex took over ChatGPT. And I spent months interviewing @gdb, @thsottiaux, @embirico, @mia_glaese, @aambrosino, and @edbayes to get inside how it all went down. Here is the full, behind-closed-doors story of the team that remade OpenAI: https://every.to/p/how-codex-happened We’re pushing the boundaries of how stories like this are told. This piece is completely agent-native—designed to be read alongside your agent inside ChatGPT’s in-app browser: - Every interview transcript is included in full: Click any quote and you (or your agent) can see the exact conversation it came from. - Built for your agent to explore: Ask your agent to pull out product lessons for your team, cross-examine the transcripts, or find insights I missed when writing the piece. It’s a story about the future of software—built to be read with an agent: https://every.to/p/how-codex-happened

  4. Big Technology54

    Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe:机器人技术进展远超外界想象

    Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe 接受 Big Technology 采访称,机器人技术的进展速度将远高于世人所知。他于 2025 年创立 Mind Robotics,已融资 10 亿美元,开发双臂双手机器人,用基于 Transformer 的模型让机器人学习可泛化技能,例如擦表面时遇到手机用手指拿起、遇到信用卡用指甲操作。

  5. Sam Altman48

    很高兴看到 Nick 的这篇分享! (引用推文核心要点:可解释性可能是当下全球最重要的科学问题,因为不了解自己在构建什么就无法解决对齐问题。Nick 曾参与 OpenAI 早期机制可解释性研究,当时对神经网络看似纠缠成任意乱结感到悲观;后来他启动了 OpenAI 首个大规模自动化可解释性项目,用原始工具发现约 2% 的神经元可读。而借助现代智能体工具和更细致的观察,情况完全不同:在高达数万亿参数的模型中,绝大多数神经元可读,其回路优美,许多著名的"纠缠神经元"案例实为误解。他原本预期的障碍大多并不存在。他认为,随着自动化科学家不断进步,雄心勃勃的可解释性研究将在我们最需要它之前被解决,且可能很快。这或许是可解释性的苦涩教训:简单的方法,在荒谬的规模下,行之有效。)

    引用Nick@nickcammarata

    interpretability might be the most important scientific problem in the world right now, as I don't think we can solve alignment if we don't know what we're building. I think I have good news about it. I co-authored early work in mechanistic interpretability at OpenAI and came away pessimistic, because neural networks appeared to fold into arbitrary tangled knots. years later, I started openai's first large-scale automated interpretability project, finding about 2% of neurons legible with the primitive tools we had with modern agentic tools and a much closer look, the picture looks totally different. the vast majority in models up to trillions of parameters are legible, and their circuits beautiful. many famous examples of tangled neurons turned out to be misunderstood. The roadblocks I expected mostly aren't there. I now think ambitious interpretability will be solved by the time we need it most, and possibly quite soon, as automated scientists keep improving. it may be a bitter lesson for interpretability: the simple thing, at absurd scale, works https://already-clean.goodfire.com/

10月16日周五
  1. a16z:News60

    a16z 图表周报:智能体购物遭电商拦截,消费意愿仍滞后

    a16z 图表周报指出智能体商务遇阻,Cloudflare 数据显示智能体与爬虫收到的 403 拒绝响应自夏季起明显增多,约为原先两倍。文章引用 NRF 数据称退货率与退货成本自 2019 年以来分别翻倍和增至三倍,并引用调查指 42% 消费者完全不信任 AI 代购,Similarweb 数据显示 AI 购物多发生在发现与购买之间的中间阶段,而非下单环节。

    推荐理由:原文汇集 Cloudflare、Similarweb 等数据,指出智能体购物正遭遇电商封禁与消费者信任不足的双重阻力。

  2. TechCrunch:AI45

    Replit CEO:未来工作是「自动驾驶公司」

    Replit CEO Amjad Masad 在 TechCrunch Disrupt 上提出「自动驾驶公司」愿景:AI 智能体承担公司大部分基础工作,人类保留判断力与品味。他以 Replit 客服流程为例,工单先由智能体结合 GitHub issues、代码库和 Linear 工单完成初步分诊,人工决定修复后一键部署另一个智能体执行。

  3. Ian Johnson 🔬🤖40

    迫不及待想深入研究了! https://already-clean.goodfire.com/

    引用Nick@nickcammarata

    interpretability might be the most important scientific problem in the world right now, as I don't think we can solve alignment if we don't know what we're building. I think I have good news about it. I co-authored early work in mechanistic interpretability at OpenAI and came away pessimistic, because neural networks appeared to fold into arbitrary tangled knots. years later, I started openai's first large-scale automated interpretability project, finding about 2% of neurons legible with the primitive tools we had with modern agentic tools and a much closer look, the picture looks totally different. the vast majority in models up to trillions of parameters are legible, and their circuits beautiful. many famous examples of tangled neurons turned out to be misunderstood. The roadblocks I expected mostly aren't there. I now think ambitious interpretability will be solved by the time we need it most, and possibly quite soon, as automated scientists keep improving. it may be a bitter lesson for interpretability: the simple thing, at absurd scale, works https://already-clean.goodfire.com/

  4. Karina47

    AI 加速科学发现这件事,有一种很 Ted Chiang 的味道,而这一切始于它自身学习机制的解析。这类研究如果没有强大的编程智能体和开放权重模型,会难做得多。很高兴看到 @nickcammarata 的研究公之于众,以及它对 AI 对齐可能意味着什么,恭喜!

    引用Nick@nickcammarata

    interpretability might be the most important scientific problem in the world right now, as I don't think we can solve alignment if we don't know what we're building. I think I have good news about it. I co-authored early work in mechanistic interpretability at OpenAI and came away pessimistic, because neural networks appeared to fold into arbitrary tangled knots. years later, I started openai's first large-scale automated interpretability project, finding about 2% of neurons legible with the primitive tools we had with modern agentic tools and a much closer look, the picture looks totally different. the vast majority in models up to trillions of parameters are legible, and their circuits beautiful. many famous examples of tangled neurons turned out to be misunderstood. The roadblocks I expected mostly aren't there. I now think ambitious interpretability will be solved by the time we need it most, and possibly quite soon, as automated scientists keep improving. it may be a bitter lesson for interpretability: the simple thing, at absurd scale, works https://already-clean.goodfire.com/

10月15日周四
  1. IT之家·人工智能40

    黄仁勋:英伟达在 AI 安全领域必须与中国企业合作

    黄仁勋 10 月 15 日接受 CNBC 采访时表示,英伟达"绝对有必要"与中国 AI 企业合作,共同监测前沿技术带来的风险,并称合作应通过"对话"实现,他一直在与中国研究人员交流。美国财政部长贝森特曾向中方提议建立双边 AI 安全风险通报机制与沟通渠道,以应对 AI 智能体失控、网络安全及生物威胁等潜在危机。

  2. a16z:News59

    Wallet Wars:智能体支付正在展开的四场争夺

    Terry Angelos 分析智能体购物要真正完成任务需要获得付款授权,由此展开钱包之战。文章指出 Stripe Link(3 亿用户)、Shop Pay(2.5 亿用户)、PayPal(4 亿以上用户)竞相接入 Muse 和 Instinct 等智能体,但 Stripe 用一次性虚拟卡代为付款会切断用户与商户的关系,丢失积分和权益。

  3. IT之家·人工智能45

    黄仁勋盛赞 OpenClaw 推动机器人技术发展,强调权限管控必须到位

    英伟达 CEO 黄仁勋在伦敦 Build a Claw 活动上称 OpenClaw 是"首个真正可信的智能体运行框架",认为它像外骨骼的大语言模型,可推动机器人领域发展。他同时强调自主系统必须做好权限管控,并提到英伟达为此开发了 OpenShell 隔离系统,主张默认任何对象都不可信、仅授予最低权限。

  4. lauren48

    亲眼见到,惊了 @_chenglou:亲爱的朋友们,我想给你们看看我最新的玩具项目 介绍 Handwired:把你的普通 JavaScript 代码变成神经网络! - 无需训练 - 输出与 JS 程序完全一致 - 完全可微分 全部可在浏览器中运行,无需 GPU

    引用Cheng Lou@_chenglou

    My dear friends, I’d like to show you my latest toy project Introducing Handwired: turn your regular JavaScript code into a neural net! - no training - exact outputs vs the JS program - fully differentiable All runnable in a browser, without GPU

  5. Elon Musk41

    这很好用。如果 Grok @Bot 在购买时出错或泄露了你的卡信息(目前从未发生过),SpaceX 会全额赔付你。

    引用X Freeze@XFreeze

    Grok @bot booked a flight for me today the entire process was really really easy…..I send a photo of my credit card and it did the entire process…. Tbh, last time I booked, the website was way too confusing…. It’s not an easy website, and Grok Bot did perfectly well and booked a flight for me…. And I got a message for a booking confirmation….going to board it soon

  6. IT之家·人工智能46

    比尔·盖茨:AI 比核武器更危险、比核能更有用,与 PC、互联网等创新都不同

    比尔·盖茨称 AI 比核武器更危险、可能比核能更有益,认为它更像"进化事件"而非"下一台个人电脑",将其视为 PC 或互联网式的创新会让人完全低估它。他承诺未来两年投入十亿美元,推动 AI 在健康、教育和农业领域落地,并预测 AI 驱动的网络攻击将在 2027 年成为变化最重大的领域之一。

  7. IT之家·人工智能41

    Anthropic 国际业务负责人普兰森:开放式 AI 模型风险高于自家模型

    Anthropic 国际业务负责人普兰森在都柏林国际人工智能峰会期间称,开放权重 AI 模型比 Anthropic 自家模型风险更高,无法为其安全性作出保证。Anthropic 本周还警告,小型 AI 模型可能被用于驱动新型僵尸网络,在智能烤箱等联网设备间自行复制扩散。普兰森称最新 Claude Opus 5.5 比早期版本便宜 40%。

  8. MIT News56

    MIT 教授 Eric So 谈新书《The Collision: What AI Does to Us》与 AI 对人类思维的影响

    MIT Sloan 教授 Eric So 在 MIT News 访谈中介绍其新书《The Collision: What AI Does to Us》,提出过度依赖 AI 会导致认知萎缩。他引用包括 Anthropic 研究在内的证据称约一半大学生查询是求简单答案的低努力查询,并提出拥抱挣扎、重视没有 AI 的自己、再投资认知盈余、把 AI 当导师而非答案机四条原则。

  9. Gary Marcus:The Road to AI We Can Trust52

    Gary Marcus 谈科技股大跌,CoreWeave 单日跌超 15%

    Gary Marcus 称科技股前一日遭重挫,其中 CoreWeave 跌幅最大,单日下跌超过 15%。他将其与 CoreWeave 不断增长的债务问题联系起来;所附媒体引述 D.A. Davidson 分析师 Gil Luria 警告,若 AI 支出热潮减弱,即便 CoreWeave 拥有 1040 亿美元收入储备,股东也可能血本无归。

  10. AI at Meta45

    观看与 @finkd、@alexandr_wang 和 @collision 的完整对话: https://x.com/collision/status/2109714250226905248

    引用John Collison@collision

    Cheeky Pint is back! Mark Zuckerberg @finkd and Alexandr Wang @alexandr_wang came to the pub to discuss their new frontier model, Muse Wonder. 00:00:24 Muse’s breakout use cases 00:07:28 The model is the product 00:14:35 Muse Wonder 00:24:56 How frontier models are built 00:48:26 Betting $100B 01:07:21 Agentic commerce 01:19:34 OpenRouter 01:20:06 Beyond the smartphone 01:27:00 Funding 01:34:06 Why AI won’t be winner-take-all 01:40:46 Meta Superintelligence Labs (MSL) 02:08:11 Working for Mark Zuckerberg