#DeepSeek

DeepSeek Harness for desktop is now available on macOS and Windows. https://x.com/i/article/2104777189275439104

DeepSeek Harness for desktop is now available on macOS and Windows. https://x.com/i/article/2104777189275439104

从 DeepSeek 官方 API 处统计的数据来看，约有 60% 的 DeepSeek Harness 用户使用了至少一个第三方插件。第三方插件是 DeepSeek Harness 用户体验中最具特色且不可缺少的一部分。DeepSeek Harness 团队将持续支持第三方插件生态的繁荣发展，并推动插件 API 趋于稳定，在将来减少和尽量避免破坏性更新。 接下来的几天我个人将每天推荐一个优质的 DSH 第三方插件，欢迎 DSH 插件作者在本 thread 下自荐。我会结合插件质量及后台实际统计到的插件使用量择优推荐。 DeepSeek Harness 团队祝大家中秋快乐阖家幸福！ （注：在用户使用官方 API 及模型时，DSH 会向官方 API 上报实际使用的插件包名和版本。此类上报不额外消耗 tokens。）

StepFun's Step 5 Preview scores 44 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, matching Kimi K3 (max) at ~2.8x lower cost per task, but trails peers on agentic evaluations Step 5 Preview is @StepFun_ai's new flagship model, with 600B total and 27B active parameters, succeeding Step 3.7 Flash (released May 2026). It scores 44 on the Intelligence Index, level with Kimi K3 (max) and just behind GLM-5.3 (max, 45) and Qwen3.8 Max (45) Key takeaways: ➤ Step 5 Preview costs ~2.8x less per Intelligence Index task than models at the same score. It costs ~$0.72 per task, against ~$2.00 for Kimi K3 (max) at the same score of 44 and ~$2.01 for GLM-5.3 (max) at 45. This is driven by pricing: at $1/$2.70 per 1M input/output tokens, it is priced below both on input and output. MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the one model that scores higher (46) at a lower cost per task ($0.13) ➤ Frontier reasoning is the standout strength, and where the jump from Step 3.7 Flash is largest. Step 5 Preview scores 46% on Humanity's Last Exam, in line with Kimi K3 (max, 47%), and 21% on CritPt, between Kimi K3 (23%) and GLM-5.3 (max, 19%). Both are up sharply from Step 3.7 Flash: +25 points on HLE and +19 points on CritPt ➤ Higher AA-Omniscience accuracy than GLM-5.3 at fewer parameters, but with more hallucination. At 600B total parameters, Step 5 Preview reaches 42% accuracy on AA-Omniscience, our benchmark measuring factual recall and hallucination, ahead of GLM-5.3 (max, 34%, 753B) and behind Kimi K3 (max, 48%, 2.8T). It attempts more questions than GLM-5.3 (68% vs 55%) and hallucinates more often when it does (43% vs 30%), landing at 16 on the AA-Omniscience Index, between GLM-5.3 (14) and Kimi K3 (20) ➤ Agentic evaluations are where Step 5 Preview lags peers at a similar Intelligence Index score. It scores 1,566 Elo on GDPval-AA, our primary evaluation for agentic performance, behind Qwen3.8 Max (1,668) and GLM-5.3 (max, 1,646). The gap holds on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (33% vs 39% and 42%), AA-Briefcase (1,432 Elo vs 1,640 and 1,525) and AutomationBench-AA (51% vs 56% and 62%) Key model details: ➤ Model Size: 600B total parameters, 27B active MoE model ➤ Context window: 1M tokens ➤ Multimodality: Text, image and video input, text output ➤ Pricing: $1/$2.70 per 1M input/output tokens, with cached input at $0.05/M ➤ Availability: StepFun first-party API, with open weights release planned for October 15th ➤ Licensing: Closed weights currently, with weights release planned for October 15th

Mozilla just published a 91-page report and it says open-weight AI is now only about 4 months behind the frontier. - 8 of OpenRouter's 10 most-used models by August token volume were open-weight, and 7 were Chinese-built, while DeepSeek became the first open model to lead the platform in weekly requests. - However, the economics are almost upside down. Open models handled roughly 20% of measured OpenRouter usage but captured only about 4% of model-layer revenue in the cited 2025 window. Mozilla attributes much of that mismatch to pricing, with closed models costing roughly 6x more per call at about 90% capability parity. The comparison shows why high usage does not necessarily translate into high revenue when one class of models is dramatically cheaper. Mozilla also warns that the revenue measurement is older than its 2026 usage data, so the current revenue split may be different. - Open models are spreading faster than they reach production: 79% of surveyed developers use them, but only 51% of open-model deployments reach production versus 63% for closed models. - DeepSeek showed that a new pretraining run may no longer be necessary for a major capability jump, gaining roughly 10 index points and then another 8 through post-training passes. -Even model diversification may provide less protection than assumed: Kimi K3 and Claude Fable 5 had a 0.72 per-task failure correlation, meaning supposed backup models often fail on the same problems.