#大佬观点

I wrote about the state of AI, why I’m concerned about the next few years, and the choices we need to make to keep the future in humanity’s hands. An Alien Mind: https://openai.com/index/an-alien-mind/

OpenAI just officially said it has reached its "automated research intern" milestone. i.e. a human-supervised system able to complete well-defined tasks that would take a skilled researcher quite few days. inside OpenAI research, agent runtime has already crossed human labor by a wide margin. 3.1-to-1 agent-to-human ratio “In terms of a standard 8 hour workday, as of mid-August, in total, the research organization uses 3.1 agent-workdays of effort for every workday of human labor.” That ratio measures agent runtime rather than equivalent productivity, but it captures how deeply parallel agent work has entered OpenAI research.

Excited to see the conversation around OpenAI’s Astra bringing recurrent architectures into the frontier spotlight. At Sapient, recurrence has been central to our vision from day one. We introduced HRM in June 2025 and open-sourced HRM-Text this May. It’s encouraging to see a direction we committed to early gaining wider attention. Want to explore recurrent reasoning yourself? HRM-Text is an open-source ~1B-parameter model trained from scratch on just 40B unique tokens, for about $1,000 in GPU compute-with a full pretraining framework to get you started. Explore the architecture. Train a model. Build on it. There’s still so much to explore in recurrent architectures. We’re continuing that work and building PRAXIST to help more researchers pursue ideas they believe in, just as we have with HRM.

Le nouveau modèle d’OpenAI a pour la première fois obtenu un score quasi-parfait à un test qui mesure l’intelligence face à une situation inconnue. Décryptage avec François Chollet, cocréateur de l’évaluation ARC-AGI-3. Par @ptiberry ➡️ https://l.lepoint.fr/CMi

So, I finally tested GPT-6 Astra. 2 real repos, 105 bugs, find and fix what you can. Max effort: GPT-6 Astra: 48/105 Fable 5.1: 43/105 GPT-5.6 Sol: 42/105 Gemini 3.8 Flash: 20/105 And it's crazy efficient. Look at the time and cost 🧵

World Labs co-founders Fei-Fei Li, Justin Johnson, Ben Mildenhall, and a16z's Martin Casado on Atlas, a world model for spatial intelligence: LLMs are built on next token prediction. Video models are built on next frame prediction. Atlas is built on new view prediction, and it's the first model to unify pixel generation and pixel reconstruction, two problems computer vision has kept in separate tracks for half a century. The practical result is a 50 to 100x reduction in what it takes to digitally capture a 3D representation of a space. Previously, you needed 100 to 300 photos of a single room. Atlas can work from just three. In this conversation, they get into the slow motion shot from The Matrix that took hundreds of cameras and now takes three iPhones, the overnight Slack message that made them bet the company in five seconds, why robotics is bottlenecked on data rather than chips, and the case that new view prediction is AI-complete. 00:00 Intro 01:50 The Matrix slow motion scene now takes three iPhones 02:48 Why new view prediction is the primitive 07:10 Unifying generation and reconstruction 11:15 Gaussian splats became the bottleneck 14:17 Dense capture used to mean 300 photos 17:30 Why reconstruction needs generation to fill the gaps 18:44 The LLM lesson image models missed 23:39 The video that made them go all in 28:04 3D design is 95% revisions 30:50 The problem in robotics is data, not chips 32:48 Why a robot policy can't be trained like an image model 34:44 When the simulator becomes the planner 36:45 Frozen time required footage full of movement 40:57 Why new view prediction is AI-complete 42:43 Nature gave animals eyes but not trees YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qn1QDDBnTA0 @drfeifei @jcjohnss @BenMildenhall @theworldlabs @martin_casado

GPT-6 Astra is coming to Devin. On FrontierCode 1.1, Astra performs within 0.4 points of Fable 5 at a 64% lower cost. It also sets a new SOTA on our internal testing benchmark, generating more comprehensive tests, clearer reports, and better video evidence.

Any smart human giving it real effort should score >90% on ARC-AGI-3

🤖🧠NEW PAPER🧠🤖 (The result of an 8-year project!) LLMs seem very different from symbolic systems. Yet LLMs excel in symbolic domains (e.g., language/code/math). How do they do it? Our finding: LLM representations have implicit symbolic structure! Link in thread ⬇️ 1/n