跳到正文
今天10月30日周五3 条
10月29日周四
  1. Arena.ai61

    Arena 公布近 9K 个智能体会话的实测结果:OpenAI 的 GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) 在 Agent Arena 排名第 8,净提升 +10.6%,单任务中位成本 $0.62,重塑 Pareto 前沿。

    引用Arena.ai@arena

    Real-world results are in: GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) by @OpenAI just landed #14 in the Code Arena: WebDev with 1671 pts, delivering Pareto level results! That’s +151 pts over GPT-5.6 Terra, now at #56. At a median cost of $0.40 per task, GPT-6.1 Terra costs 28% less than GPT-5.6 Terra ($0.56 per task), reshaping the Pareto frontier. Compared to other models in the family, GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is incredibly efficient: - 81 pts below #4 GPT-6.1 Sol (1752 pts), at 75% lower median cost per task. - Just 6 pts below #11 GPT-6 Sol (1677 pts), at 76% lower median cost per task Congrats to the @OpenAI team on this release!

  2. Google64

    Google 发布 Gemini 4 Carbon 的早期预览,该模型以 59 分位列 Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5 第一,比 Gemini 4 Argon 高 9 分,在复杂推理、知识和科学任务上领先。引用的 Artificial Analysis 评测称其编码智能体仅次于 Claude Opus 5.5,定价 $4/$20 per 1M tokens 与 Argon 标准价一致,目前仅向部分用户开放,尚未公开可用。

    引用Artificial Analysis@ArtificialAnlys

    Google’s Gemini 4 Carbon is the new #1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5, and second only to Claude Opus 5.5 on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index Gemini 4 Carbon scores 59 on Intelligence Index v5, driven by leading performance in complex reasoning, knowledge, and scientific tasks. It also has large gains in coding and knowledge work, particularly when compared to other Gemini models, but it is not leading in all these areas. As with launch of Gemini 4 Argon, Gemini 4 Carbon is being rolled out to selected users and is not yet publicly available. Google is offering a 50% launch discount, with no confirmed end date. All our charts and figures use standard pricing for both Gemini 4 Carbon and Argon. Key results for Gemini 4 Carbon with high reasoning: ➤ Gemini 4 Carbon leads the Intelligence Index v5, with the #1 score in 4 of the 9 Index evaluations: HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench-Science, AA-Omniscience, AutomationBench-AA. Carbon makes substantial gains elsewhere but is not leading in coding and knowledge work ➤ Behind only Claude Opus 5.5 on coding agents: With Antigravity CLI, Gemini 4 Carbon (high) scores 59 only 3 points behind Claude Code with Claude Opus 5.5 (max, 62) on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index. Carbon ranks second on both Terminal-Bench 4.0 (64%) and FrontierCode v1.1 (51%), behind Claude Opus 5.5 (max) at 56%. Google has historically underperformed in this area and so this improvement stands out ➤ Improved agentic knowledge work, but not yet leading: On AA-Briefcase, Gemini 4 Carbon (high) scores 1609 Elo, a 126-point improvement over Gemini 4 Argon (high, 1483), but still behind models including Grok 4.7 (xhigh, 1638), Muse Wonder (max, 1659) and Kimi K3.1 Pro (1678). The largest gain comes from Presentation, up 293 Elo to 1598, alongside a 120-point improvement in Analytical Quality to 1671 ➤ Lower Cost per Task than Claude Opus 5.5 for comparable overall intelligence: Gemini 4 Carbon costs $7.76 per Intelligence Index task, ~23% less than Claude Opus 5.5 (max, $10.04) but ~1.2x GPT-6 Astra (max, $6.25). It uses 123k output tokens per task, 29% fewer than Claude Opus 5.5 (max, 173k). At the same $4/$20 standard pricing, its Cost per Task is in line with Gemini 4 Argon ($7.68), while scoring 9 points higher on the Intelligence Index ➤ Leading AA-Omniscience v1.1 score, with low hallucination: Gemini 4 Carbon scores 54 on our recently updated AA-Omniscience v1.1, 6 points ahead of Claude Opus 5.5 (max, 48) and 8 points ahead of Gemini 4 Argon (46). Accuracy (% correct) rises 10 points over Argon to 58%, while its hallucination rate rises from 4% to 11%. This is still the second lowest of any model, behind only Argon, compared with 50% for both Claude Opus 5.5 (max) and GPT-6 Astra (max) Key model details: ➤ Context Window: 1M tokens ➤ Multimodality: Text, image, video, and speech input, with text output ➤ Pricing: $4/$20 per 1M input/output tokens, the same as Gemini 4 Argon’s standard pricing, with a 50% discount. Cached input tokens receive a 95% discount ($0.20 per 1M) Congratulations to the @GoogleDeepMind team!

  3. Arena.ai68

    Arena 宣布 Gemini 4 Carbon (High) 首次上榜:Text Arena 第一(1528 分),Agent Arena 第二(+16.2% 净提升),Code Arena: WebDev 第四(1768 分)。

    引用Arena.ai@arena

    Exciting news: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) from @GoogleDeepMind just made a huge debut on Arena, landing #1 in Text Arena, #2 in Agent Arena, and #4 in Code Arena: WebDev. Back at the top, Gemini 4 Carbon delivers frontier intelligence and reshapes the Pareto frontier across three arenas. In Agent Arena, Gemini 4 Carbon ranks #2 with a +16.2% net improvement across +21.9K real-world agentic sessions from our global community, surpassing top models GPT-6 Astra and Fable-5.1. At $1.80 median cost per task, Gemini 4 Carbon (High) costs 72% less than the #1 ranked Claude Opus 5.5 (Max). Its standouts by key signals: - #1 Steerability (+18.6%): can the model course-correct when you push back? - #2 Praise vs Complaint (+37.9%): implicit sentiment in users' reactions - #3 Confirmed Success (+18.7%): explicit “yes, that worked” from users In Code Arena: WebDev, Carbon scored 1768 pts landing #4: - Just 2 pts below #3 Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xHigh), at 1770 pts - 89 pts above #11 Gemini 4 Argon (High), at 1679 pts By category, it ranks #3 in Gaming and Simulations, and #5 in Brand & Marketing. In Text Arena, Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is the new #1 with 1528 pts, now ahead of Gemini 4 Argon (High) at #2 with 1520 pts. Congrats to the @GoogleDeepMind team on this huge milestone!

  4. Arena.ai69

    Arena 宣布 Google DeepMind 的 Gemini 4 Carbon (High) 登上 Agent Arena、Code Arena: WebDev 和 Text Arena 的帕累托前沿。在 Agent Arena 中它排名第 2,净提升 +16.2%,每任务中位成本 $1.80,比排名第 1 的 Claude Opus 5.5 (Max) 低 72%。详情见 https://arena.ai/leaderboard/agent/pareto

    引用Arena.ai@arena

    Gemini 4 Carbon (High) by @GoogleDeepMind landed on the Pareto frontier in Agent Arena, Code Arena: WebDev, and Text Arena! In Agent Arena, it ranks #2 with +16.2% net improvement at $1.80 median cost per task. This is 72% less than #1 Claude Opus 5.5 (Max). Dive into the Agent Arena Pareto, and see where Gemini 4 Carbon (high) landed on the Pareto frontier for Code Arena: WebDev and Text at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/agent/pareto

10月28日周三
10月27日周二
  1. Mustafa Suleyman57

    Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman 宣布 MAI-Image 现居全球图像编辑模型第二,称再次超越 Google、Meta、xAI 和 GPT-Image-2.5-Flare,可在 MAI Playground 试用。引用的 Artificial Analysis 分析称 MAI-Image-2.7-Preview 在 AA-Image-Editing v2.1 榜单排名第二,7 项编辑动作全面高于 MAI-Image-2.6,其中 4 项排名第一,最大提升为 Composition & Framing(+57 Elo),目前仅支持图像编辑,文生图功能即将推出。

    引用Artificial Analysis@ArtificialAnlys

    Microsoft's MAI-Image-2.7-Preview takes #2 on AA-Image-Editing v2.1, close behind OpenAI's GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst (max) and a clear step up from MAI-Image-2.6 MAI-Image-2.7-Preview is Microsoft AI's newest image editing model, succeeding MAI-Image-2.6, released in August. In our testing, MAI-Image-2.7-Preview scores higher than MAI-Image-2.6 on all 7 editing actions we measure, and ranks #1 on 4 of them: Scene & Style Edit, Text or Symbol Edits, Reasoning-Based Edit, and Enhancement & Restoration. This new model improves on MAI-Image-2.6 with the biggest gains in Composition & Framing (+57 Elo), Text or Symbol Edits (+49) and Scene & Style Edit (+48). We see its best use cases to be in Live-Action Film, Consumer and Frontier edits, where it ranks #1. MAI-Image-2.7-Preview is available today in MAI Playground for image editing only, with text to image stated to be coming soon. Congratulations to @MicrosoftAI on the release! See below for our detailed analysis and example outputs of MAI-Image-2.7-Preview in the Artificial Analysis Image Arena 🧵

  2. Arena.ai75

    Arena 宣布 OpenAI 的 GPT-6.1 Terra 已进入 Agent Arena,用户可前往测试,分数即将公布。该平台基于全球用户提供的数百万真实长程智能体任务评测模型,模型可调用网页搜索、文件系统和终端工具完成复杂工作流,排行榜用因果追踪方法衡量模型相对平均模型的结果表现。

    引用OpenAI@OpenAI

    GPT-6.1 Terra:以更低的价格提供快速且强大的计算机使用能力。 GPT-6.1 Terra 能理解屏幕上的内容,跨应用执行操作,写作自然流畅,是一个能胜任你整个工作日的更强大模型,并具备承担更多工作的效率。

  3. Artificial Analysis 完整文章76

    Artificial Analysis 评测 GPT-6.1 Terra:以不到三分之一成本推进性价比前沿

    Artificial Analysis 评测 OpenAI 发布的 GPT-6.1 Terra,称其在低中 effort 下达到智能与成本的 Pareto 前沿,价格为 GPT-5.6 Terra 的一半或更低($1/$5 每百万输入/输出 token)。

    推荐理由:评测方给出 GPT-6.1 Terra 在智能指数、幻觉率和编码代理基准上的具体得分与成本对比,读者可据此评估其性价比位置。