全部 AI 动态

You already gave the LLM the answer. So why is it writing it out from scratch? Introducing a new AI model architecture: Constrained Decoding Models (CDMs) LLMs were built to write. Most production workloads just need an answer: fast, consistent, and affordable. CDMs are purpose-built for 1 task each. They read your input once and skip the token-by-token generative loop that makes LLMs slow and expensive. Not just a decision model, but a family of 3 CDMs live today: • Classify: define your labels and get back a calibrated probability + reason for each. Used for routing, tagging, and intent detection. • Extract: describe the entities in natural language and get back well-formed JSON with confidence scores + citations. Used for web scraping, document processing, and PII redaction. • Summarize: pass in long text, images, or PDFs and get back a consistent summary under 1,000 tokens. Used for context compaction, metadata generation, and transcript digests. Built for production: • 1M tokens of multimodal (text + image) input, 31x larger than Jev • 77.2% on DecisionBench vs Jev's 72% • 200x faster, 467x cheaper than frontier LLM APIs • $0.05/M input tokens. Output is free (yes, even for summarize) Live on your favorite platforms today: @OpenRouter @vercel_dev @LiteLLM @LangChain @TrustedRouter @itsArthurAI @useRouterPlus Get 50M input tokens for free (for the first 50 hours) at link below 👀

Let's start the week with MiniCPM V4.7 from @OpenBMB 🔥 ✨ 35B-A3B: On-device MoE - 35B/ 3B active ⚡️ - 13+ tok/s on iPhone 17 Pro Max with ~3GB RAM - Outperforms Qwen3.6 35B-A3B in overall score AND inference time ✨1B: Ultra-lightweight VLM - Outperforms Qwen3.5 0.8B in BOTH performance & efficiency ✨ Both support: - Image, multi-image & video understanding - Efficient 4×/16× visual token compression - iOS, Android & HarmonyOS - Apache 2.0

We're launching our leaderboard for FrontierCode 1.1, a private evaluation from Cognition that tests models on completing coding tasks in a way that would actually get merged by maintainers of real-world repositories @cognition announced FrontierCode in June 2026 and updated it to version 1.1 in July. Cognition built the dataset with open source maintainers who spent more than 40 hours per task. Each task requires the agent to make a change to a real open source repository, then checks both unit tests and qualitative tests for what maintainers would require to merge the change. We run FrontierCode 1.1 Main, the primary 100-task set of the benchmark's 150 tasks, using our Stirrup open source reference harness for apples-to-apples comparisons across models. All tasks are private to avoid contamination. Each attempt is graded with both blocking and non-blocking criteria. An attempt that fails any blocking check scores zero, and one that passes them all scores between 70% and 100%. Unlike other coding evaluations, FrontierCode has a more holistic view of success based on real usage. Models need to pass unit tests, but are also assessed on behaviors like making excessive changes and large diffs, modifying files outside the relevant scope, or adding unhelpful tests. We think this approach is valuable in the current context: models are now very capable at coding tasks, but their changes can still require substantial cleanup before a maintainer would merge them. Key takeaways: ➤ Leading models still fail more than 40% of the time: Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback) leads at a score of 52% after passing blockers in 58% of its attempts. Nine of the 100 tasks were not passed in any attempt by any of the models we evaluated for launch ➤ The top of the leaderboard is tightly packed: nine models from six labs score between 43% and 52%. MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the leading open weights model at 45%, followed by DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) and Kimi K3 (max) at 44% ➤ GPT-6.1 Sol (max) offers the strongest performance for its cost: At $0.81 per task it scores 49%, matching Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback). This means it achieves similar performance to leading Anthropic models, at less than a tenth of the cost per task Thank you to @silasalberti, @ybenpan, @cl571128, and the rest of the team at Cognition for building FrontierCode and collaborating with us to bring it to Artificial Analysis - we’re working to add FrontierCode to our coding agent leaderboard very soon.

Introducing Natura-1, our first general foundation model for the physical world. It follows natural-language instructions zero-shot and turns them into action with dexterous hands. Natura-1 is a 50-billion-parameter mixture-of-experts (MoE) model pretrained on one million hours of egocentric human experience. On top of this foundation, we conduct efficient post-training on a limited amount of robot data to adapt pretrained world knowledge to dexterous manipulation, yielding a model that generalizes to a wide range of unseen scenarios. Natura-1 follows complex natural-language instructions zero-shot, reasoning through spatial constraints, multi-object relationships, and negative conditions. It can also autonomously carry out long and continuous workflows to perform long-horizon executions. Natura-1 provides early evidence that generalization—and even emergent behavior—can coexist with the complexity of dexterous hands. Further progress depends on the full stack: infrastructure for faster training and real-time inference, pretraining data at greater scale and coverage, and models that transfer to robots with less adaptation. We expect it to be a long-term research and engineering effort.

We're launching our leaderboard for FrontierCode 1.1, a private evaluation from Cognition that tests models on completing coding tasks in a way that would actually get merged by maintainers of real-world repositories @cognition announced FrontierCode in June 2026 and updated it to version 1.1 in July. Cognition built the dataset with open source maintainers who spent more than 40 hours per task. Each task requires the agent to make a change to a real open source repository, then checks both unit tests and qualitative tests for what maintainers would require to merge the change. We run FrontierCode 1.1 Main, the primary 100-task set of the benchmark's 150 tasks, using our Stirrup open source reference harness for apples-to-apples comparisons across models. All tasks are private to avoid contamination. Each attempt is graded with both blocking and non-blocking criteria. An attempt that fails any blocking check scores zero, and one that passes them all scores between 70% and 100%. Unlike other coding evaluations, FrontierCode has a more holistic view of success based on real usage. Models need to pass unit tests, but are also assessed on behaviors like making excessive changes and large diffs, modifying files outside the relevant scope, or adding unhelpful tests. We think this approach is valuable in the current context: models are now very capable at coding tasks, but their changes can still require substantial cleanup before a maintainer would merge them. Key takeaways: ➤ Leading models still fail more than 40% of the time: Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback) leads at a score of 52% after passing blockers in 58% of its attempts. Nine of the 100 tasks were not passed in any attempt by any of the models we evaluated for launch ➤ The top of the leaderboard is tightly packed: nine models from six labs score between 43% and 52%. MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the leading open weights model at 45%, followed by DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) and Kimi K3 (max) at 44% ➤ GPT-6.1 Sol (max) offers the strongest performance for its cost: At $0.81 per task it scores 49%, matching Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback). This means it achieves similar performance to leading Anthropic models, at less than a tenth of the cost per task Thank you to @silasalberti, @ybenpan, @cl571128, and the rest of the team at Cognition for building FrontierCode and collaborating with us to bring it to Artificial Analysis - we’re working to add FrontierCode to our coding agent leaderboard very soon.

Muse Wonder will soon power experiences in @Muse , and rolled out first to subscribers earlier today. I’ve been using it in my own Muse for a little while and appreciate how this model works harder and draws on memory more precisely with Active Focus and Active Memory.

Introducing SubQ Snap, the first long-context decision model for real enterprise work. Snap is the only decision model or LLM where compute per token stays constant as context grows. • 384K tokens of multimodal context, 12x larger than Jev. • 61.7 on Decision Index v0.2.1 vs Jev’s 57.9, outperforming on 13 of 16 enterprise benchmarks. •Processes 100K tokens and returns a decision in under one second. •$0.05/MM input tokens. Output is free. Available today to anyone. The first 10,000 sign-ups get 100M free input tokens. We’ll likely hit capacity fast and will add users as we add compute. Compute offers welcome 🙂. Latency will be variable as we tune the platform to this new model and category of users. Model speeds are 80ms for minimal context, 250ms for 32k, 660ms for 100k, and 2.5 seconds for 384k. Visit: https://subq.ai/

introducing muse wonder our new frontier model. state-of-the-art at personal agents and professional agents. our largest and most capable model yet—rivals the big bois

我们很高兴推出 Muse Wonder 系列，包括 Muse Wonder 和 Muse Wonder Full，这是我们迄今为止最强大的模型。两者都是前沿模型，旨在为个人和专业代理任务提供最先进的性能。 Muse Wonder 今天可通过 Meta Model API 和 Muse Code 使用。Muse Wonder Full 今天面向 Muse Code 订阅者提供。Muse Wonder 很快还将为我们的个人代理产品 Muse 中的体验提供支持，首先向订阅者推出。

MUSE WONDER 🍉 this model was developed to power personal agents. three highlights: - ACTIVE MEMORY: best memory across days/weeks/months - ACTIVE FOCUS: gets your tasks done - DOMAIN EXPERTISE: sota in finance & legal, strong in health

Introducing Muse Wonder, our new family of frontier models with state of the art performance for personal and professional agentic work.