#开源生态

Looks like today may be a record day for token volume % of open models on Vercel AI Gateway: 🟦 Open 78.4% 🟨 Closed 21.6% While spend 💲 usually tells a different story, #3 and #4 today are Moonshot AI & DeepSeek. Adding Z⁠.ai, their combined spend surpasses OpenAI (#2). (Do note that's the spend for inference of the model across providers (mostly in the US), not revenue going directly to the open weight labs.)

https://x.com/i/article/2100908964779040768

推出 Unsloth Desktop 🦥 首个可在本地运行和训练模型的桌面应用。 • 开源。支持 Mac、Windows 和 Linux • 支持 MLX、扩散图像/视频、音频、GGUF • 将 Claude Code 和 Codex 连接到本地 LLM • 准确率提升 50%，自愈式工具调用 + 沙箱化代码执行 • 适用于 CPU + 多 GPU 配置——NVIDIA、AMD、Intel、Mac • 训练模型速度提升 2×，VRAM 占用减少 70% • 私密网页搜索、深度研究、RAG、MCP 及导出（NVFP4、GGUF） • 使用 Unsloth 的 OpenAI 兼容 API 和云端模型 • 安全地远程部署 LLM，随时随地访问 Unsloth Desktop 现已在 http://unsloth.ai 和 GitHub 上发布。 GitHub：https://github.com/unslothai/unsloth 博客与指南：https://unsloth.ai/docs/desktop

Mozilla just published a 91-page report and it says open-weight AI is now only about 4 months behind the frontier. - 8 of OpenRouter's 10 most-used models by August token volume were open-weight, and 7 were Chinese-built, while DeepSeek became the first open model to lead the platform in weekly requests. - However, the economics are almost upside down. Open models handled roughly 20% of measured OpenRouter usage but captured only about 4% of model-layer revenue in the cited 2025 window. Mozilla attributes much of that mismatch to pricing, with closed models costing roughly 6x more per call at about 90% capability parity. The comparison shows why high usage does not necessarily translate into high revenue when one class of models is dramatically cheaper. Mozilla also warns that the revenue measurement is older than its 2026 usage data, so the current revenue split may be different. - Open models are spreading faster than they reach production: 79% of surveyed developers use them, but only 51% of open-model deployments reach production versus 63% for closed models. - DeepSeek showed that a new pretraining run may no longer be necessary for a major capability jump, gaining roughly 10 index points and then another 8 through post-training passes. -Even model diversification may provide less protection than assumed: Kimi K3 and Claude Fable 5 had a 0.72 per-task failure correlation, meaning supposed backup models often fail on the same problems.

Mozilla just published a 91-page report and it says open-weight AI is now only about 4 months behind the frontier. - 8 of OpenRouter's 10 most-used models by August token volume were open-weight, and 7 were Chinese-built, while DeepSeek became the first open model to lead the platform in weekly requests. - However, the economics are almost upside down. Open models handled roughly 20% of measured OpenRouter usage but captured only about 4% of model-layer revenue in the cited 2025 window. Mozilla attributes much of that mismatch to pricing, with closed models costing roughly 6x more per call at about 90% capability parity. The comparison shows why high usage does not necessarily translate into high revenue when one class of models is dramatically cheaper. Mozilla also warns that the revenue measurement is older than its 2026 usage data, so the current revenue split may be different. - Open models are spreading faster than they reach production: 79% of surveyed developers use them, but only 51% of open-model deployments reach production versus 63% for closed models. - DeepSeek showed that a new pretraining run may no longer be necessary for a major capability jump, gaining roughly 10 index points and then another 8 through post-training passes. -Even model diversification may provide less protection than assumed: Kimi K3 and Claude Fable 5 had a 0.72 per-task failure correlation, meaning supposed backup models often fail on the same problems.

Mozilla just published a 91-page report and it says open-weight AI is now only about 4 months behind the frontier. - 8 of OpenRouter's 10 most-used models by August token volume were open-weight, and 7 were Chinese-built, while DeepSeek became the first open model to lead the platform in weekly requests. - However, the economics are almost upside down. Open models handled roughly 20% of measured OpenRouter usage but captured only about 4% of model-layer revenue in the cited 2025 window. Mozilla attributes much of that mismatch to pricing, with closed models costing roughly 6x more per call at about 90% capability parity. The comparison shows why high usage does not necessarily translate into high revenue when one class of models is dramatically cheaper. Mozilla also warns that the revenue measurement is older than its 2026 usage data, so the current revenue split may be different. - Open models are spreading faster than they reach production: 79% of surveyed developers use them, but only 51% of open-model deployments reach production versus 63% for closed models. - DeepSeek showed that a new pretraining run may no longer be necessary for a major capability jump, gaining roughly 10 index points and then another 8 through post-training passes. -Even model diversification may provide less protection than assumed: Kimi K3 and Claude Fable 5 had a 0.72 per-task failure correlation, meaning supposed backup models often fail on the same problems.