引用Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai
The White House and Anthropic may have found the first serious path to restore Mythos and Fable access without pretending jailbreaks can be eliminated.
AI regulation may be shifting from vague fear to a benchmark based tests of model failure, because completely removing absolutely all jailbreak is probably not a possible target.
The proposed framework would score how far the bypass went, what capabilities became reachable, how repeatable the attack was, and whether the exposed behavior had real operational consequences.
Both sides are now moving toward a shared way to score what a jailbreak actually means.
The hard truth is that perfect immunity is probably the wrong target; a recent red-team study found even hardened frontier models still produced confirmed harmful completions under sustained automated attack, with Fable 5 remaining more robust than Opus 4.8 but not invulnerable.
So once, for a newly released model, the governments can ask the same questions every time, how much was bypassed, what capability was exposed, how reproducible was the attack, and what damage could follow, thats a much more practical path.