Belgian man convicted of hate speech describes the judicial rationale for his latest conviction. I asked Gemini: Is this man's account of his conviction accurate? Gemini replied that it was grossly inaccurate. So, I copied and pasted Gemini's response, and asked Grok to reply to it. Grok told me that Gemini was mixing up two different cases, and that the tweet was an accurate representation of the latest judicial proceeding against Van Langenhove. I went back to Gemini, and asked it to reply to what Grok had just told me, and it responded: "Grok is completely correct. I mixed up the cases, and I appreciate the correction." As I've tweeted in the past: This sort of thing happens all the time.