OpenAI最新模型GPT-5.5在Artificial Analysis智能指数评测中以3分优势重回第一，终结了与Anthropic和Google的三方胶着。该模型提供五个推理强度等级，最高强度（xhigh）在多项关键评测中领先，尤其在知识基准AA-Omniscience上提升显著。尽管每token价格较前代翻倍，但因token使用量减少约40%，运行该指数的净成本仅增约20%。其中等强度版本能以Claude Opus 4.7（max）四分之一成本达到同等智能得分。然而，其幻觉率高达86%，远高于竞争对手的36%-50%。
GPT-5.5 takes OpenAI back to the clear number one in AI. OpenAI’s new model tops the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by 3 points, breaking a three-way tie with Anthropic and Google
OpenAI gave us pre-release access to test all five reasoning effort levels: xhigh, high, medium, low and non-reasoning.
➤ OpenAI topping five headline evaluations: GPT-5.5 (xhigh) leads Terminal-Bench Hard, GDPval-AA and our newly hosted APEX-Agents-AA. The model trails only other OpenAI models in CritPt and AA-LCR, and comes second to Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview on three additional evaluations. The largest gains are on AA-Omniscience (+14 pts), our knowledge and hallucination benchmark, and τ²-Bench Telecom (+7 pts), a customer service agent benchmark.
➤ 20% more expensive to run our Intelligence Index: Per-token pricing has doubled from GPT-5.4 to $5/$30 per 1M input/output tokens. However, a ~40% token use reduction largely absorbs the hike - resulting in a net ~+20% cost to run our Intelligence Index.
➤ Effort a clear ladder for balancing intelligence and cost: GPT-5.5 (medium) scores the same as Claude Opus 4.7 (max) on our Intelligence Index at one quarter of the cost (~$1,200 vs $4,800) - although Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores the same at a cost of ~$900. GPT-5.5 (low) approximates Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, high) on our Intelligence Index at half the cost to run (~$500 vs ~$1 ,000).
➤ Number one in GDPval-AA with an Elo of 1785: GPT-5.5 (xhigh) leads Claude Opus 4.7 (max) by ~30 pts and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by ~470 pts. GDPval-AA is Artificial Analysis’ benchmark that leverages OpenAI’s GDPval dataset to evaluate models on real-world economically valuable tasks.
➤ Top AA-Omniscience accuracy, but trailing the frontier on hallucination: Our private AA-Omniscience benchmark rewards factual knowledge across diverse topics, but punishes hallucination. GPT-5.5 (xhigh) has the highest accuracy at 57% - meaning the model can recall facts in the Omniscience corpus more effectively than any other model. However, it has a hallucination rate of 86% - vs Opus 4.7 (max) at 36%, and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview at 50%. This makes it more likely to answer a question when it does not ‘know’ the answer. The 14 pt gain in AA-Omniscience from GPT-5.4 (xhigh) was largely driven by knowledge, with a modest improvement in hallucination.
Congratulations to the team at @OpenAI and @sama on the launch
来源：Artificial Analysis · x.com